AI-Powered Recruiting Dashboard
Interactive candidate matching interface
Impact & Results
Recruiter adoption from spreadsheets to unified platform
Reduction in time-to-match for candidates
Bias incidents after ethical framework implementation
Accessibility compliance across all components
Fragmented Workflow Diagram
Spreadsheets + Third-party Tools
The Challenge
Recruiters were drowning in a fragmented ecosystem of third-party tools and spreadsheets, spending 70% of their time on manual tasks instead of building relationships with candidates.
The challenge wasn't just technical—it was about building trust in AI-powered matching while ensuring ethical treatment of candidate data and eliminating bias from the recruitment process.
"How do we transform recruitment workflows with AI while maintaining transparency and fairness for every candidate?"
Understanding Our Users
Through extensive user research, I identified two distinct recruiter personas with different workflow priorities:
Sarah - Talent Acquisition
"I spend 70% of my time filtering out unqualified candidates from our pipeline."
Focus: Discovering new talent, filtering large candidate pools
Marcus - Talent Delivery
"I need to prioritize applied candidates, not discover new ones."
Focus: Managing active applications, candidate relationships
User Research Insights
Pain Points & Workflow Analysis
Building Trust Through Ethical AI
Privacy-first design thinking drove every AI decision, establishing a framework that would be applicable to any trust-focused product.
AI Ethics Framework
Consent → Transparency → Bias Detection
Consent-First Architecture
- Dual-path UX: Equal treatment regardless of AI consent
- Transparent Processing: Clear communication about data use
- Granular Controls: Candidates control their AI participation
Algorithmic Transparency
- "Why this match?" component for every recommendation
- Bias detection dashboard for recruiting teams
- Explainable AI using LIME-based feature importance
UX Engineering & Technical Leadership
SLDS Migration Strategy
Led the migration from SLDS 1 to SLDS 2 while maintaining feature parity and improving performance:
- Cataloged 47 custom components requiring migration
- Maintained backwards compatibility during transition
- 34% reduction in bundle size through SLDS 2 efficiencies
AI Component Architecture
Designed scalable AI matching system with ethical constraints:
- Hybrid collaborative filtering + content-based algorithm
- Fairness constraints integrated into loss function
- Real-time bias monitoring and correction
AI Component Architecture
Matching System + Bias Detection
Design Process & Iteration
Discovery
Stakeholder interviews, user research, and competitive analysis to understand the fragmented recruitment landscape.
Define
AI ethics framework design, persona development, and technical architecture planning with engineering teams.
Design
Iterative prototyping with bias testing, accessibility validation, and cross-platform responsive design.
Key Design Solutions
AI Matching Interface
Explainable Candidate Recommendations
AI-Powered Candidate Matching
Persona-specific matching interfaces that reduce administrative overhead while maintaining transparency:
- Talent Acquisition: Focus on filtering unmatched candidates
- Talent Delivery: Prioritize applied candidate relationships
- Explainable Results: Every match includes reasoning
Privacy-First Consent Management
Innovative dual-path architecture ensuring equal treatment regardless of AI participation:
- 87% consent rate through transparent communication
- Manual flagging system for non-consenting candidates
- Equal consideration guaranteed across all candidates
Consent Management UI
Transparent AI Processing Options
Bias Detection Dashboard
Real-time Fairness Metrics
Real-Time Bias Monitoring
Proactive bias detection and correction built into the matching algorithm:
- 0.02 gender disparity (industry standard: <0.05)
- 0.01 ethnicity disparity across protected classes
- Automated alerts for bias threshold violations
Cross-Functional Leadership
Successfully orchestrated collaboration across multiple disciplines to ensure ethical AI implementation:
AI Ethics Team
Weekly bias review sessions and compliance framework development
Legal Team
GDPR/CCPA compliance and AI decision auditing documentation
Engineering Team
Technical feasibility sessions and component handoff processes
Enablement Team
Training material collaboration and adoption strategy development
Cross-functional Collaboration
Ethics • Legal • Engineering • Enablement
Measurable Impact & Validation
Data-driven validation of design decisions demonstrating successful behavioral transformation:
Adoption Metrics
95% Adoption • 67% Time Reduction
Adoption & Behavioral Change
- Baseline: 12% Salesforce usage
- Target: 85% adoption within 6 months
- Achieved: 95% adoption, 78% daily active usage
Efficiency Gains
- Time-to-First-Match: 4.2 hours → 1.4 hours (-67%)
- Manual Data Entry: 89% reduction through AI parsing
- Spreadsheet Dependencies: 100% elimination
Trust & Fairness Metrics
- AI Consent Rate: 87% of candidates opt-in
- Transparency Satisfaction: 4.6/5.0 rating
- Trust Score: 89% of recruiters trust AI recommendations
Technical Performance
- Page Load Time: <2.3s (vs 3.1s Salesforce benchmark)
- Accessibility Score: 94/100 (WCAG AAA compliance)
- System Reliability: 99.7% uptime during migration
Trust & Fairness Metrics
87% Consent Rate • 4.6/5 Trust Score
Strategic Impact
Framework Adopted by 3 Teams
Lessons Learned & Strategic Impact
What Worked
- Early ethics integration prevented late-stage redesigns
- Persona-specific AI tuning improved adoption rates
- Technical constraint documentation accelerated development
Scalable Framework Impact
- AI ethics framework adopted by 3 other product teams
- SLDS migration process became company standard
- Bias detection methodology shared across industry forums
"This project demonstrates how privacy-first design thinking drives innovation in AI-powered products—directly applicable to building user trust through transparent, ethical technology."
Technical Implementation Details
AI Algorithm
- Matching: Hybrid collaborative filtering + content-based
- Bias Mitigation: Fairness constraints in loss function
- Explainability: LIME-based feature importance
Performance Optimization
- Lazy Loading: 45% bundle reduction
- Caching: 89% cache hit rate
- API Optimization: 62% request reduction via GraphQL
Accessibility Engineering
- WCAG AAA: 94/100 compliance score
- Screen Reader: Full NVDA/JAWS compatibility
- Keyboard Navigation: Complete tab-based flow